Every caller has a screenshot of a 30x. That screenshot tells you almost nothing, because you don't see the twenty calls around it. Here's how to check a record properly, in about ten minutes per caller, before you let their calls cost you money.
Three things: every call is timestamped before the move, every call stays on the record, and every result is measured from the call. Miss any one and the record can be made to look like anything.
Followers rarely check any of them. Callers know that.
Open the token's chart at the minute the call was posted and see where the price already was. If the call says "$40k entry" but the chart shows $150k at that minute, the call is being dated from a price nobody reading it could get.
Then check the things that can be changed after the fact:
The tell people miss: compare the post time with the token's first buyers. If a wallet the caller is known to use bought minutes before the post, the call was an exit plan, and you were the buyer it needed.
Because the run before the call was never available to anyone following it. A token that went from $10k to $400k and was called at $100k did a 4x from the call, not a 40x. Counting from launch borrows gains the caller's audience couldn't have caught.
Even "peak from the call" is a ceiling, not a result. The peak is one candle. Nobody sells the whole bag at the exact top, and on a thin pool a big sell knocks the price down as it fills, the same gap between paper and real profit covered in realised vs unrealised PnL.
Your multiple is the peak market cap divided by the market cap where you bought, not where the caller did. The formula is simple, and it usually hurts.
Say a coin is called at $40k market cap and later peaks at $1.24M. That's a 31x from the call. By the time you've read the post, opened your wallet and bought, other followers have pushed it to $90k. Your best case is 1.24M / 90k, about 13.8x, and that's if you sold the top.
The more followers a caller has, the bigger this gap gets, because the followers are the ones moving the price between the call and your fill.
Mostly by letting you look at the wrong list. Survivorship bias does the rest: the failures quietly drop out, and what's left looks like skill.
If a record shows no failures, it has been edited. On memecoins, most calls fail, and any honest ledger shows it.
A made-up but typical caller advertises "31x, 15x, 12x this month". You get the full list: 20 calls.
Hit rate at 2x: 7 of 20, or 35%. Now follow every call with $100, take exactly 2x on each one that reached it, and assume the other 13 go to zero. You put in $2,000 and get back $1,400, a 30% loss, from a channel whose headline was 31x. Adjust for buying late, as in the section above, and it gets worse.
That's not proof the caller is bad. Some of those 13 could have been sold for something. But it shows why the headline multiple is the least useful number on the page. The questions that matter are the hit rate, the size of the typical loss, and how many calls you couldn't sell at all.
The same way this page says to judge anyone. MoonRadar's live feed lists every call across HOOD, BNB, ARC and Solana, newest first, with how far it ran from the call. Each live call shows its entry market cap when MoonRadar called it and the highest it went after the call, and recent calls are tracked for 24 hours after they're made.
The "Biggest calls" list is exactly what it says, the biggest runs measured from the call, so read it next to the full feed, not instead of it. Coins that pumped after their dev was flagged or the token turned malicious are listed separately as high-risk runners, not hidden and not recommended.
A peak from the call is still a peak, not what you'd have made. A call is just a call: these are high-risk memecoins, most fail, and you manage your own entry and exit. Before you buy any call, paste the contract into the scanner and run the checks yourself.
Check MoonRadar's call record, then scan the token